Mama Knows Breast

Andi in the news

Watch Andi on the CBS Early Show: Click here.

Watch Andi on The NBC NIGHTLY NEWS: Click here.

Watch Andi on THE TODAY SHOW: Click here.

Breastfeeding News

Bookmark and Share

The Brooklyn Public Library transferred a guard who chastised a mom for breastfeeding. See the story in the New York Daily News.

A study from Denmark
found that early pacifier use can lead to shorter duration of breastfeeding. This confirms something we’ve heard before. So if you want to use a pacifier, wait until the baby is at least 3 to 4 weeks old and breastfeeding is well-established. One benefit of pacifiers… they can decrease the risk of SIDS.

A new study found
that hospital practices can influence whether moms will breastfeed, and how long they’ll do so. See the storyin U.S. News & World Report. Moms who gave birth in hospitals that offered supplementation of formula or water were less likely to achieve their breastfeeding goals.

The Today Show and The Atlantic Article About Breastfeeding

Bookmark and Share

The Today Show did a story this morning on breastfeeding, calling it “Is Breast-feeding Really Best?” It featured Dr. Nancy Synderman and Hanna Rosin, the author of The Atlantic article about breastfeeding. You can watch The Today Show piece below.
At the outset, the segment actually does a good job of outlining some of the health benefits of breastfeeding for babies. Rosin talks about how she is still breastfeeding her third child. And Synderman and Rosin talk about how hard it is to go back to work and continue to breastfeed. (True). They also discuss the “peer pressure” some moms feel to breastfeed. (True, too).
But Synderman and Rosin don’t talk about a key point… Formula is an invention. So Rosin’s argument that the science backing up the benefits of breastfeeding isn’t clear, seems a bit superficial. I’m not a statistician, so I’m not going to argue the merits of different scientific studies. But it seems logical that something made by our bodies is going to be better than something made in a factory. (For a more reasoned argument of the health benefits of breastfeeding see The Motherwear Blog).
Rosin and Synderman also overlook that fact that using formula, in place of breast milk, is a luxury. It’s a luxury we have in developed nations. So all this talk about worrying how moms feel about their “choice” whether or not to breastfeed is really a discussion about affluence. If moms didn’t have access to clean water and electricity to sterilize bottles, how would they give babies safe formula? If there was an emergency (natural or man-made), and moms couldn’t get access to formula, what would they do? How would they feed their children?
I support a mom’s right to choose whether to use formula or breast milk. In this country, it’s a highly personal decision, and moms should feel good about whatever choice they make. But let’s not forget how fortunate we are to have this choice. Furthermore, if we had better family leave policies, we wouldn’t worry about how hard it is for breastfeeding moms to go back to work.
Finally, to the mainstream media outlets… of which I used to be a part… let’s try not to sensationalize breastfeeding any more. Using headlines like “Is Breast Best?” may draw in viewers and make your advertisers happy, but it doesn’t address the real issues going on here.

What Are Your Thoughts on This Anti-Breastfeeding Article in The Atlantic

Bookmark and Share

The April issue of The Atlantic has a piece titled, “The Case Against Breastfeeding.” Here’s a quote:
In certain overachieving circles, breast-feeding is no longer a choice—it’s a no-exceptions requirement, the ultimate badge of responsible parenting. Yet the actual health benefits of breast-feeding are surprisingly thin, far thinner than most popular literature indicates. Is breast-feeding right for every family? Or is it this generation’s vacuum cleaner—an instrument of misery that mostly just keeps women down?
And another quote:
In Betty Friedan’s day, feminists felt shackled to domesticity by the unreasonably high bar for housework, the endless dusting and shopping and pushing the Hoover around—a vacuum cleaner being the obligatory prop for the “happy housewife heroine,” as Friedan sardonically called her. When I looked at the picture on the cover of Sears’s Breastfeeding Book—a lady lying down, gently smiling at her baby and still in her robe, although the sun is well up—the scales fell from my eyes: it was not the vacuum that was keeping me and my 21st-century sisters down, but another sucking sound.
So here’s my two cents… we’re truly fortunate, in this country, that women have the choice whether to breastfeed or formula feed. We have access to clean water to make formula. We can sterilize bottles. Choosing formula isn’t a choice between life and death as it can often be in developing countries. (For that reason, most likely, the World Health Organization recommends breastfeeding until at least the age of two).
So I think this is an opinion piece masquerading as reporting. The author, Hanna Rosin, misses an essential point… We’re mammals. Mammals breastfeed. It’s how we survive. Formula is an invention. And if there is absolutely no empirical advantage to breast milk over formula, as she suggests, then why are we here? Why are we even having this discussion?
What do you think?

Ohio Woman in Court: Says She Was Fired for Pumping At Work

Bookmark and Share

Here’s a case to watch: The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing arguments this week on whether a company discriminated against a woman by firing her for taking unscheduled breaks to pump breastmilk. From the Dayton Daily News:
LaNisa Allen, a former general laborer at a Totes/Isotoner Corp. warehouse in West Chester, is suing the company, saying it engaged in illegal gender discrimination by denying her extra restroom breaks to relieve pain caused by breast milk engorgement. She said other Totes workers weren’t required to seek permission for extra restroom breaks to relieve discomfort from menstrual symptoms or the need for frequent urination.
Allen’s attorneys say it’s gender discrimination because she was fired to relieve discomfort due to lactation, a condition exclusive to women.
Totes, which prevailed against Allen in a 2008 trial and a subsequent appeal, argues that the company didn’t discriminate because breastfeeding doesn’t legally constitute an illness or medical condition. The company says there is legal precedent showing that employers don’t have to give extra breaks to breastfeeding women.

Breastfeeeding Decreases Risk of SIDS

Bookmark and Share

A new study published in the journal Pediatrics found that breastfeeding reduces the risk of SIDS, or Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, by half. Here’s a news story and the journal article.
The Study’s Conclusion:
CONCLUSIONS. This study shows that breastfeeding reduced the risk of sudden infant death syndrome by ~50% at all ages throughout infancy. We recommend including the advice to breastfeed through 6 months of age in sudden infant death syndrome risk-reduction messages.

Rhode Island and Breastfeeding, and an Ohio Mom is Ticketed For Breastfeeding While Driving

Bookmark and Share

Some tidbits for a snowy day here in the Northeast…
Rhode Island has a new law that allows women to breastfeed in public.
An Ohio mom was is headed to court for breastfeeding while driving. The reason… the child wasn’t in a car seat.
And here’s an essay in about breastfeeding and dating.