<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mama Knows Breast &#187; Discrimination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mamaknowsbreast.com/discrimination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mamaknowsbreast.com</link>
	<description>This is the place to find out the latest breastfeeding news, tips and anecdotes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>California Company Fined For Firing Mom Who Breastfed</title>
		<link>http://www.mamaknowsbreast.com/archive/2009/08/california-company-fined-for-firing-mom-who-breastfed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mamaknowsbreast.com/archive/2009/08/california-company-fined-for-firing-mom-who-breastfed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breastfeeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mkb.local/2009/08/california-company-fined-for-firing-mom-who-breastfed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A California taqueria has to pay $46k to a worker it fired for breastfeeding. Here&#8217;s the piece in Forbes. And here&#8217;s the story in the San Francisco Chronicle: Marina Chavez gave birth to her fourth child a month prematurely in April 2007 and returned to work at a Los Angeles-area taqueria 30 days later, needing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A California taqueria has to pay $46k to a worker it fired for breastfeeding.   Here&#8217;s the piece in <a href=" http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2009/08/21/general-us-breastfeeding-discrimination_6804959.html">Forbes.</a>  And here&#8217;s the story in the <a href=" http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/08/23/BAVO19BMJ1.DTL">San Francisco Chronicle</a>:<br />
<em>Marina Chavez gave birth to her fourth child a month prematurely in April 2007 and returned to work at a Los Angeles-area taqueria 30 days later, needing the $7.55-an-hour cashier job to feed her family.<br />
On her third night back, her boyfriend brought their newborn son to work and Chavez breastfed the child in their car during her lunch break.<br />
The next night, she got a call from the company&#8217;s general manager, Jaime Acosta, who, according to a state civil rights commission, told her he didn&#8217;t want her back at work until she was done breastfeeding. When Chavez said she couldn&#8217;t wait that long, Acosta replied that he didn&#8217;t like her attitude and she was fired, the commission said.<br />
Her dismissal has led to a precedent-setting ruling by the state Fair Employment and Housing Commission in San Francisco. The decision, made public last week, said punishing a female employee for breastfeeding during a work break amounts to sex discrimination&#8230;<br />
That isn&#8217;t what happened, Acosta said Friday. He said he fired Chavez for incompetence and insubordination, an assertion he also made to the commission, which didn&#8217;t believe him.<br />
&#8220;I did not fire her because she was breastfeeding,&#8221; he said in an interview. &#8220;I just made a comment to her &#8211; &#8216;Is it safe to be out here in the parking lot?&#8217; &#8221; If the law requires employers to allow breastfeeding, he said, &#8220;I have no problem with that.&#8221;<br />
Acosta said the small company, which owns three taquerias in Inglewood and Hawthorne, would appeal the ruling, but might have to file for bankruptcy because of the damage award.<br />
A 2002 California law requires employers to provide a reasonable amount of break time for an employee who wants to breastfeed an infant child, unless a break would seriously disrupt the employer&#8217;s operations. California also allows a mother to breastfeed her child &#8220;in any location, public or private.&#8221;<br />
No state court or agency had previously considered, however, whether denying the right to breastfeed amounts to sex discrimination. Awarding damages to an employee in such a case is rare if not unprecedented in the United States, said Loretta McCallister, spokeswoman for La Leche League, a support organization for breastfeeding women.<br />
&#8220;That&#8217;s teaching employers that there&#8217;s nothing wrong with it,&#8221; she said.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mamaknowsbreast.com/archive/2009/08/california-company-fined-for-firing-mom-who-breastfed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

